What Are the Key Differences Between Risklytics and THREE by Berkshire Hathaway General Liability Insurance?
Robotics and Hardware Carrier Appetite
Risklytics says machinery operating around people can make general liability placement difficult and that it places risks with insurers seeking robotics and hardware business. It does not name the issuing carrier publicly. THREE lists general liability within its combined policy but the reviewed record does not describe robotics-specific appetite. A hardware company should ask THREE to confirm the machinery class and carrier acceptance before relying on the broad line listing. [8] [8] [1]
Physical Injury Versus Product Performance
Risklytics describes protection when an outside person is hurt or their property is damaged, such as a demo visitor tripping or a falling bracket damaging customer equipment. It says financial loss from product failure belongs under Tech E&O instead. THREE's reviewed line listing does not spell out the same boundary. Ask both providers whether the loss scenario is bodily injury/property damage or a technology-performance claim, and which policy responds. [8] [1]
Requested Limits and Application
Risklytics says buyers commonly face requests for $1 million per incident and $2 million total per year, while clarifying these are typical asks, not guaranteed limits. It offers an online application and says no broker fee is added on top of premium. THREE provides an online package quote. Compare actual per-occurrence and aggregate limits and any package fees rather than treating Risklytics' typical figures as a firm offer. [8] [9] [2]
