What Are the Key Differences Between biBerk and Corgi General Liability Insurance?
Customer injury: Corgi names a form and biBerk names a setting
Corgi’s illustrative summary identifies the standard CORG-CGL-0100 as occurrence-based and says it covers third-party bodily injury. biBerk names customer injury on business premises as an example. These facts give a startup two different items to inspect, but a trigger description is not the same thing as a premises scenario, and biBerk’s selected claim does not state its trigger. Corgi also cautions that its summary is illustrative rather than policy wording. [3] [1]
Evidence hold: the custody exclusion has no paired biBerk term
Corgi says its standard-form summary excludes damage to property in the insured’s care, custody, or control. biBerk describes third-party property-damage claims but does not address that custody scenario in the selected claim. Do not read the general category as an affirmative response to the exclusion. Without matching biBerk wording, the source record cannot support a second paired treatment and this page remains held. [3] [1]
